Margaret Kelly Michaels Today Thirty Years Later

  1. Kids memories years later, the pain and anguish of going thru it again, etc), though they said they still thought she was guilty. She returned to the area, though I don't know what she is up to at this time. Now that you reminded me of her, think I will check around and see if I can find out where she is today, what she is up to.
  2. Defendant, Margaret Kelly Michaels, appeals from her jury conviction on 115 counts of sexual offenses involving twenty children who were in the Wee Care Nursery School (Wee Care). The trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate term of forty-seven years in prison, with fourteen years of parole ineligibility, and $2,875 in fines payable to.
  3. Margaret Kelly MICHAELS, Defendant-Respondent. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Decided June 23, 1994. The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J. In this case a nursery school teacher was convicted of bizarre acts of sexual abuse against many of the children who had been entrusted to her care.

TRENTON, N.J. -- 'Believe the children' was the battle cry when a young aspiring actress was sentenced to 47 years in prison for sexually molesting children at a New Jersey day-care center.

Margaret Kelly Michaels Today Thirty Years Later

Margaret Kelly Michaels Today Thirty Years Lateral

Footnote 21 Although the charges against Clark were dropped, Schuler went to prison two years later. In 1988, aspiring actress Margaret Kelly Michaels, an employee at Wee Care in the small suburb of Maplewood, New Jersey, spent five years in jail after a child said she had taken his temperature.

Five years later, as Margaret Kelly Michaels' conviction comes before a state appeals court, her supporters charge that believing the children put an innocent woman behind bars. They compare the case to the mass hysteria of the 17th century, when 19 men and women were hanged as witches in Massachusetts on the word of a pack of teenage girls.

Advertisement

'There is so much doubt here, to send someone away for that kind of sentence is just outrageous,' said Nat Hentoff, who writes a column on civil liberties for the Village Voice.

Hentoff believes zealous investigators and anxious parents induced the children to believe events that did not happen.

To the other side, Michaels is a young woman who engaged at least 19 young children in bizarre sex play at the Wee Care Day Nursery in Maplewood, threatened them and left them with emotional scars they may carry forever.

Prosecutors, parents and others who believe Michaels is guilty say that children have the right to be taken seriously and to be protected.

On Monday, a state appeals court hears oral arguments in the case. The judges there must attempt to balance the rights of an accused abuser against the need to protect children and to decide whether the judge who presided over Michaels' trial made the correct choices.

Advertisement

The appeal is going forward without the lead lawyer, Morton Stavis of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York. Stavis, at 77 a veteran civil rights lawyer, was killed in an accident in December, leaving the case in the hands of Robert Rosenthal, a young lawyer who first became involved as a student intern.

The Michaels case cuts across conventional political lines. Those who have rallied to her defense include Hentoff and Dorothy Rabinowitz, a conservative editorial writer and critic for the Wall Street Journal, while radical lawyer William Kunstler is part of the defense team.

'A good many liberals shy away from these kinds of cases because they think it's axiomatic to believe the children,' Hentoff said, suggesting that many reporters, judges and, for that matter, jurors do not want to look like they are condoning child abuse.

Anna Quindlen, the author of a syndicated New York Times column, has weighed in on the prosecution side.

'Kelly Michaels was convicted of those charges,' Quindlen said. 'That does happen to be the case.'

Margaret Kelly Michaels Today Thirty Years Later

Lisa Manshel, author of a book on the case, 'Nap Time,' and one of the few reporters to sit through the entire nine-month trial, attacked Rabinowitz in the Washington Journalism Review, charging that she has published misleading information about a trial she did not attend. Manshel accuses other journalists of basing their reports not on the facts, but on an article Rabinowitz wrote for Harper's magazine.

'It's ironic that a press drive crying 'witch hunt' shows so many signs of being on a witch hunt of its own,' Manshel concluded.

Advertisement

Rabinowitz responds that Manshel, who first learned of the case from friends of the parents, 'was brought in as an advocate.'

Like most of the defendants in daycare sex abuse trials, Michaels seems an unlikely criminal. She grew up in the suburbs of Pittsburgh, graduated from a Roman Catholic women's college, moved to New Jersey to be close to the New York art and theater world and got a job at Wee Care to make money.

Michaels was convicted in 1988 and jailed immediately. Her sentence includes a 14-year period to be served without parole eligibility.

The charges of abuse surfaced after her resignation in 1986 to take a job at another daycare center. The investigation began when a Wee Care pupil, submitting to a rectal thermometer during a doctor's examination, said his teacher had done the same thing.

The most damning witnesses were the victims, who testified from the judge's chambers over closed-circuit TV. They described games played in the nude and said Michaels had penetrated them with tableware and forced them to perform sex acts on her and on each other.

Jurors clearly believed the children, spending 13 days of deliberations reviewing the videotapes of their testimony and audiotapes of investigative sessions.

The childrens' testimony was buttressed by testimony from parents who said that they had seen changes in behavior that appeared, after the fact, to be the result of abuse, and by the evidence of investigators and experts who examined the children.

Advertisement

Defense experts were not allowed to examine the children, a key issue in the appeal.

But there was little or no physical evidence of abuse or eyewitness testimony. The first stories from the children came with the investigation, although some parents later said their children had been trying to tell them indirectly that something was wrong at Wee Care.

Margaret Kelly Michaels Today Thirty Years Later

The daycare center was in an Episcopal Church parish house that was also used by the rector and his staff, but no one saw any abuse. A Wee Care teacher who entered Michaels' classroom unexpectedly said Michaels behaved as if she had been interrupted in the midst of something untoward.

Margaret Kelly Michaels Today Thirty Years Lateralis

The law on prosecutions involving young children as victims was evolving even while the trial was played out. Judge William Harth dismissed a number of counts mid-trial following a court ruling in another case on the use of hearsay testimony.

Margaret Kelly Michaels Today

Margaret Kelly Michaels Today Thirty Years Later

Since then, the state Supreme Court has limited the use of expert testimony on 'child sexual abuse syndrome,' saying it cannot be offered to prove that abuse occurred. Rosenthal believes that decision helps his case.